Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:02
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Telescope Captures First-Ever Ultra-Fine Magnetic Stripes on the Sun’s Surface! - The Daily Galaxy
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
See how the national debt grew to more than $36 trillion - The Washington Post
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
A year later, Trump continues to appeal his historic criminal case. Here's what we know - NPR
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Elizabeth Hurley Strips Naked for 60th Birthday, Gushes Over Being in Love - TMZ
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.